|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| |
The access to some of the deliverables has been limited to the EC
representatives, the members of the External Advisory Board and the
Consortium (for confidentiality and copyright reasons). Those who would
be interested in getting an electronic version of these documents may
contact us ([picture@lema.ulg.ac.be->mailto:picture@lema.ulg.ac.be]).
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
This deliverable combines the information regarding impacts of cultural tourism upon built heritage diversity, quality of life and urban economies. It starts with an introduction about cultural tourism and its growth before highlighting the need for impact assessment. Tourism is one of the 21st century biggest industries, and it certainly plays a crucial role in terms of earnings and job creation. As a result, it is often perceived an ideal way to regenerate urban centres and bring prosperity to towns. Besides, cultural tourism appears to many as a win-win strategy as it is thought its development would bring benefits to tourists and residents alike. Yet, it needs to be underlined that tourism does not always mean benefits. Like any other form of development, it may have positive but also negative impacts upon the local environment, economy and socio-cultural context. An over- and uncoordinated development is especially likely to lead to deterioration of cultural heritage, tangible or intangible. The deliverable then illustrates how impacts can sometimes create irreversible effects, add up, or create other impacts (these are the notions of irreversible effects, cumulative effects and indirect effects). It then summarises all impacts in a static matrix before ending with illustrations of the interrelation and cumulativeness of impacts, showing how the economy affects quality of life
and built heritage and how in turn these can affect the economy. The main outcome of this deliverable however, is to propose a dynamic chart available in an Excel sheet. This chart combines the different impacts of the matrix plus the indicators of built heritage diversity, quality of life and impacts upon the economy identified in the course
of the PICTURE project.
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Europe is a major tourist destination and the urban tourism industry constitutes a key market for the future. Yet, the tourism industry faces a critical lack of in-depth research and scientific monitoring, especially at the European level. This is explained by various factors. The first of these is that tourism has long been organised and supported by State organisations. Sometimes conceived as a way of promoting national identity, tourism efforts have long been directed to major cities and leisure centres/areas. Trans-national European tourism networks, like European cultural routes for instance, were very often disregarded, even though city networking has long been a key aspect of the European model of territorial development. The actions of international bodies, like the EU (through its INTERREG
programme, for example), the Council of Europe, and UNESCO, have been instrumental in promoting such cross-border cultural networks. Unfortunately these policies have mostly been directed towards financial support or international reward and recognition. They were rarely accompanied by genuine scientific support, in terms of strategic planning, impact assessment or long-term monitoring.
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Many city authorities call upon consultants’ services when they want to make a tourism development plan, or a feasibility study for a special project. These consultants have, throughout Europe, a common method of work which is fully described in the paper, and illustrated with examples : diagnosis, orientations, program of actions, means of implementation, prefiguration of operations, evaluation and assessment of impacts, assistance in implementation…
Theses consultants can bring a lot to the tourism development within the city, in terms of efficiency, innovation, coherence within the various steps to be taken, realistic objectives on target markets ; furthermore, as they work on a certain number of cases and keep track with other European experiences, they convey the good practices from one city to another.
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|